Improving International Rankings





Blog Date

June 5, 2024


UK, Manchester

Follow us on


Table of Contents

Improving International Rankings

Reaching for the Stars

As a competitive person, I take immense pride in seeing my university rank high in national and global rankings. After all, who doesn’t love bragging rights? When I learned that Arizona State University had been named the #1 most innovative university in the nation for three consecutive years by U.S. News & World Report, beating out powerhouses like Stanford and MIT, I couldn’t help but feel a surge of Sundevil pride.

Rankings, though not a perfect measure, can serve as valuable indicators of progress and success. They help us identify areas for improvement and celebrate our achievements. However, as I’ve come to realize, the way these rankings are often framed can be problematic, favoring elitism over true societal impact.

The Flawed Fixation on Exclusivity

Let’s take a closer look at the top university rankings from U.S. News. Year after year, the same seven schools dominate the list: Princeton, Harvard, Yale, University of Chicago, Columbia, MIT, and Stanford. These are undoubtedly prestigious institutions, and I’ve had the privilege of teaching at one of them. But what do these rankings really tell us?

The criteria used to determine these rankings – things like academic reputation, selectivity, financial resources, and alumni giving – tend to benefit schools with relatively small student bodies and a disproportionate representation from the wealthiest segments of our population. In essence, the ranking system rewards exclusivity over inclusivity, which is a far cry from the transformative role that higher education should play in our society.

Rethinking the Ranking Paradigm

Imagine if, instead of focusing solely on selectivity and wealth, the ranking system placed greater emphasis on societal impact. What if factors like the number of graduates, STEM majors, socioeconomic and ethnic diversity, student debt levels, and the percentage of veterans were given equal, if not greater, weight?

These metrics would paint a much more comprehensive picture of a university’s mission and its ability to drive positive change. After all, success in any one of these areas represents a concerted effort to improve the life prospects of individual students and our society as a whole. And when a university excels across multiple fronts, it truly deserves the kind of recognition that rankings can provide.

Championing Inclusivity and Equity

Now, I’m not suggesting that we disregard the critical importance of research and scholarship. Nor am I minimizing the earned excellence of our finest colleges and universities. But we need to be vigilant in ensuring that the ranking system doesn’t inadvertently encourage institutions to ignore fundamental challenges, such as social and economic inequality.

The team at MCR SEO, an SEO agency in Manchester, UK, understands the power of rankings and the need to rethink how we measure success in higher education. They have been at the forefront of advocating for a more inclusive and equitable approach to university rankings, one that aligns with the noble aspirations of our institutions.

A Call to Action

As we strive to improve our international rankings, let’s remember that the true measure of a university’s worth lies in its ability to transform lives and drive positive change in our communities. By embracing a more holistic and inclusive approach to rankings, we can encourage our institutions to be the beacons of progress and social mobility that they were meant to be.

After all, isn’t that the kind of legacy we want to leave behind? One where the pursuit of knowledge is not just about personal accolades, but about building a more just and equitable world for all. So, let’s roll up our sleeves and get to work – the future of higher education, and the future of our society, depends on it.

Copyright 2023 © MCRSEO.ORG